The elephant, the blind, and the intersectoral intercomparison of climate impacts
1st paragraph: When decision makers discuss anthropogenic climate change, they often ignore the mighty elephant in the room, namely the question of what global warming really means on the ground. By all accounts, the impacts on our physical environment and society would be starkly different if our planet warmed by “just” 2 °C (1, 2), by a “dangerous” 4 °C (3), or by a “mind-boggling” 6–8 °C (4). However, the pictures of those sweltering worlds that are emerging from scientific research are still regrettably vague, blurred, and fragmentary (see, for example, refs. 5–7). The main reason for this vagueness is as obvious as it is tantalizing: the sheer diversity and complexity of potential climate-change effects on the existing multitude of regions, sectors, and cultures make the swift advancement of robust knowl- edge in this field extremely challenging.
Credits: www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1321791111 PNAS Early Edition
Fair Use OK
DOWNLOAD FILE — PDF document, 570 kB (584,339 bytes)
